Skip to main content

Question 2.3.9

Solutions

TZ
leumasicOfficial

7 months ago

(a) We are not allowed to use the algebraic limit theorem because there is no guarantee that ana_{n} converges to a given value.

For the actual proof, suppose ana_{n} is bounded by M>0M > 0 and that bnb_{n} converges to 0. By definition, for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, we have

NN,nN    anbnanM<ϵMM=ϵ\exists N \in \mathbb{N}, \quad n \geq N \implies \abs{a_{n}b_{n}} \leq \abs{a_{n}M} < \frac{\epsilon}{M} M = \epsilon

(b) We do have an example of a sequence anbna_{n}b_{n} which does not converge. Suppose

an=(0,1,0,1,0,)a_{n} = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, \dots)

and

bn=(1,1,1,1,).b_{n} = (1, 1, 1, 1, \dots).

Obviously ana_{n} is bounded by 1 and bn10b_{n} \rightarrow 1 \neq 0. However, the sequence anbna_{n}b_{n} simply is

anbn=an=an=(0,1,0,1,0,)a_{n}b_{n} = a_{n} = a_{n} = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, \dots)

so anbna_{n}b_{n} diverges in this case. On the other hand, if ana_{n} were equal to bnb_{n}, then our sequence would be convergent (why). Therefore, it is not possible to establish whether the sequence anbna_{n}b_{n} converges or not.

(c) Suppose any sequence ana_{n} and bnb_{n} such that

an0bnb.\begin{aligned} a_{n} \rightarrow 0 \\ b_{n} \rightarrow b. \end{aligned}

Since bnb_{n} is convergent, it also is bounded then. Therefore we can apply the proposition from (a) and obtain

limanbn=0,\lim a_{n} b_{n} = 0,

thereby proving rule (iii) from the algebraic limit theorem when an0a_{n} \rightarrow 0.

0
Submit a solution
Optional • Markdown

Sign in to share your solution for this question.

Sign in

Navigate

Q 2.3.9

Navigate

Q 2.3.9